<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Context in SharePoint 2010 Business Connectivity Services (or the lack of it)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.vossers.com/index.php/2009/12/13/context-in-sharepoint-2010-business-connectivity-services-or-the-lack-of-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.vossers.com/index.php/2009/12/13/context-in-sharepoint-2010-business-connectivity-services-or-the-lack-of-it/</link>
	<description>SharePoint &#38; Code</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jaap Vossers</title>
		<link>http://blog.vossers.com/index.php/2009/12/13/context-in-sharepoint-2010-business-connectivity-services-or-the-lack-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1180</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaap Vossers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vossers.com/?p=229#comment-1180</guid>
		<description>Hi Brian. Don't get me wrong I do love the new BCS stuff! :) The point of this post is to point out to people that something important seems to be missing, and it would be really cool if Microsoft would agree and decided to change this before the RTM version is released. Obviously if you don't plan on developing reusable BCS solutions, you won't be affected by this limitation, so I do see your point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brian. Don&#8217;t get me wrong I do love the new BCS stuff! <img src='http://blog.vossers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> The point of this post is to point out to people that something important seems to be missing, and it would be really cool if Microsoft would agree and decided to change this before the RTM version is released. Obviously if you don&#8217;t plan on developing reusable BCS solutions, you won&#8217;t be affected by this limitation, so I do see your point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Bedard</title>
		<link>http://blog.vossers.com/index.php/2009/12/13/context-in-sharepoint-2010-business-connectivity-services-or-the-lack-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1169</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Bedard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vossers.com/?p=229#comment-1169</guid>
		<description>I love the new External List functionality.  It takes the Business Data column to its expected evolution.  I'm sorry you're having a hard time porting it and making it reusable.  When I start actually developing solutions for the External List I'll be sure to investigate it and make a blog post.  Just remember every new feature with Microsoft takes a little time to gain traction and become "solid". We should be happy they gave us this functionality -- I've been waiting for it ever since the BDC was introduced. Maybe because creating an External List is so easy once the External Content Type is created, they want us to use Designer to create them. And because I like to write my own features and site definitions and use CAML and API to provision components, I might be a little irked too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the new External List functionality.  It takes the Business Data column to its expected evolution.  I&#8217;m sorry you&#8217;re having a hard time porting it and making it reusable.  When I start actually developing solutions for the External List I&#8217;ll be sure to investigate it and make a blog post.  Just remember every new feature with Microsoft takes a little time to gain traction and become &#8220;solid&#8221;. We should be happy they gave us this functionality &#8212; I&#8217;ve been waiting for it ever since the BDC was introduced. Maybe because creating an External List is so easy once the External Content Type is created, they want us to use Designer to create them. And because I like to write my own features and site definitions and use CAML and API to provision components, I might be a little irked too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
